Blockchains are wildly popular at the moment with experts and everyone else. Not a lot of people had played around with the term ‘blockchain operating system’. We should all learn this since they will become a part of everyday life in Web 3.0.
A typical OS is nothing more than a big program that underlies everything. It’s a connection between hardware and software. Because all programs you’re using, whether it’s Internet Explorer or Sims, require entry to the hardware’s resources.
Rather than running directly on the hardware, an operating system allows you to customize everything from physical resources such as memory and processors to the mouse and keyboard.
Before the invention of OS’ computers were running on machine languages. Operating systems came to be in the 1950s, while Windows came around in 1985. Here is how it looked like:
We have more than a billion personal computers these days and 4 billion smartphones. This is very much dominating over the number of cars in the world.
Operating systems obviously became one of the most successful techs ever. Their history shows us that even useful revolutionary tech can take years actually to take over. We can say that the same fate waits for blockchain operating systems. So there is no point in telling people that that failure can be connected to these terms.
Just as regular operating systems, a blockchain one has a layer under the software to render interfacing with the hardware simpler. In the case of these OS’, the hardware is the blockchain. When you look at it, the blockchain is just a global supercomputer.
Not even quantum computers will be able to overpower blockchain since it is just a better supercomputer. Rather than interfacing with the hardware on one computer, a blockchain OS interfaces with hardware on all nodes in the network base, forming a blockchain.
Just like conventional operating systems, the lone method of interfacing with the blockchain was programming it straight on it.
A distributed ledger operating system deals with a user’s commands but does them on the blockchain.
Blockchain OS’ have the aim of simpler development, yet a better user experience overall. If you google ‘first blockchain operating system,’ you will see lots of vying firms to snatch that honor.
The Blockchain Operating System Marketplace
Although the regular operating system environment had been brewing for decades before coming into the spotlight, we’ve seen blockchain operating systems evolve to global trade and finance. In addition to mobile space and into the personal computer arena, all of that just in the last few years.
But even with that, these systems have a long way to go. Such conventional systems came into use well over half a century ago. So don’t think that blockchain OS’ will steal the thunder in marketplace shares just yet. This will be a hard and long journey, just like blockchain’s path.
This Blockchain accurately illustrates the number of wallet users and how the climb was slower but recently moved up.
There were almost no wallet holders ’til circa 2013, 4 years after the Bitcoin network launched; at the beginning of 2009.
Since the introduction of non-mobile blockchain OS’ was last year, we can render the blockchain operating system marketplace pretty much on with the times.
This mirrors the story and numbers of the specific Ethereum addresses over time:
One can see much faster growth than in BTC, as people had nearly 10 years to get acquainted with the story of blockchain by this time. Anyhow, Ethereum launched in 2015, and it needed two years for a significant boom in usage.
Given the nascence of the blockchain OS marketplace, there is not enough evidence to accurately predict growth. But if other blockchain adoption graphs are reliable, we may see broad adoption of blockchain operating systems before 2030.
The OS marketplace needed a long time to get acceptance, and the pioneering versions were fundamental. Here are some current OS’ for blockchain. But keep in mind that this is just the beginning of the world’s blockchain experience.
The usage of this OS is for worldwide commerce and financing. As of writing this post, it was just 4 months old.
ConsenSys generally has a background in the sector – the Ethereum founder Joseph Lubin started it in 2014. With nearly 800 employees, they have the reputation of leaders in the blockchain solution area. Also, they are vying for a billion-dollar valuation. They really do have a say in this market.
Codefi is a product suite that has modular abilities for digitizing financial apparatuses. The aim is to give people a simple tokenization system for financing, like payment systems, data analytics, etc.
Not like other blockchain OS mentioned here, Codefi is live on the marketplace. Several case studies show for it, going from property industries to systems for cryptocurrency subscriptions for businesses.
Seeing how established the company is and having clients like Santander, Codefi is great as a potential entry point for blockchain into the mainstream.
The youngest mention of blockchain OS’s we found was a three-year-old Steemit article about EOS – the Epic (blockchain) Operating System. The company is famous for raising four million with no live product.
There are claims that the OS gives a user all they need – from databases to account access and schedules. Just like any blockchain OS, it aims to connect decentralized computers (blockchains) with apps.
The article has a promo angle, but this pic sums up nicely what the operating system wants to give users.
Pity that EOS is afflicted by several problems, ranging from over-centralization to lower performance. Not having the same amount of case studies as OS’ like ConsenSys Codefi, EOS appears to struggle on the level of expertise, no matter what their ICO is.
LibertyOS is possibly the nearest in this series to an “operating system,” in which most people talk about it. They claim to be the pioneering blockchain operating system, but their landing page demands investments, not downloads of operating systems. That’s due to their product not being fully released yet, but a bet aversion is available.
The OS reminds us of Ubuntu, minimalist-wise, with a focus on safety and privacy. You also get a TOR browser, and since they don’t follow user behavior, it has the feel of a crypto-Linux.
The “blockchain” component of the operating system is mostly seen thanks to the LIB Token, their proprietary token, which advertisers have to pay to score advertisement-space. Consumers can gain from watching those advertisements. By doing so, LibertyOS aims to be a financially independent system, with the operating system free for downloading.
It claims to be lightweight. The proof is in its minimum system needs, like one gigabyte of RAM and a Pentium 4, released in 2000.
Since blockchain is not necessarily an efficient system, this raises the question: how have they allegedly made the operating system so powerful? When checking their white paper, some things pop up: this is simpler than Windows and similar OS’ because they know lots of consumers will lean on to the web more instead of a full-suite desktop area.
This reflects Google Chrome in a way, whose operating system usage is on low-powered yet fast Chromebooks.
Also, they say they have more efficiency in thread schedules, calling it 3-gen ahead of Windows 10 in terms of algorithms and procedures. This is hard to prove, and Microsoft’s heavy background operations do not pull down LibertyOS.
But, the last point rings true for other OS’ that focus on blockchains. The reason for this OS’s speed can be described with the words ‘ease of use’.
Alas, they are not the only ones focusing on that – Chrome OS and macOS aim for the same thing, so they probably won’t be able to take over the marketplace, but in time they will find their fans in the cryptocurrency community.
Overledger claims to be the 1st blockchain operating system around the globe. It works on interconnecting distributed ledgers, but this is not what the concept of an “OS” really is. Conventional operating systems are not meant to connect Linux, macOS, and Windows. They work on their own.
The company states that OS’s are here to give us interoperability between hardware and software, yet they state that their OS integrates all the different distributed ledgers.
In the growing competitive market, they don’t have a lot of say.
They are calling themselves one of the biggest blockchain OS’ around the globe. But even though the state is on their landing page, it becomes clear they are a blockchain, not a blockchain OS.
The primary advantage is good TPS and throughput. The website also talks about the TRON Wallet and the mainnet. Both show that TRON is no more than a blockchain.
This blockchain operating system wants to give users a Linux-like OS. They are not totally transparent on their dwellings – the landing page states that they are a decentralized cloud computing blockchain network, but they are listed on some exchanges.
GemOS is intended to be an enterprise blockchain operating system based on improving collective wisdom, or “Data IQ,” of historically siloed info. Like the aforementioned OS, what precisely they do and their success is not so clear, but they score a mention because the sphere of blockchain OS is so fresh.
The blockchain OS is still gaining traction, even in 2020. Yes, EOS announced itself three years ago, but not until ConsenSys Codefi and their release has space looked like it will go somewhere.
When will the blockchain OS sector gain solid ground? Maybe in the next two years, maybe in the next ten – it remains to be seen. It took decades for conventional OS’ to become adopted, and just a couple of years for Ethereum.
This shows that the pace of tech adoption is increasing all the time. This is particularly true in the blockchain arena, which is improving better than even IoT and artificial intelligence. If we witness the rise of the blockchain operating system, it’s likely to integrate such innovations, from IoT to artificial intelligence to autonomous, self-sufficient identity.
What’s sure is that lots of great blockchain operating system moves are coming soon. Let’s hope that soon we will be comparing traditional and blockchain operating systems as equals.