Decentralized storage services can’t come soon enough. This crazy year now has another happening added to it — Joe Biden, Kanye West, Bill Gates, and more than 125 other high-profile Twitter accounts had their accounts compromised by a hack. This led to a renewed decentralization debate.
Since it’s clear that even the most famous social media sites are hackable, it’s no wonder that people are more vocal about moving from centralized platforms. This especially goes since the event we just saw on Twitter is far from the last one we need to worry about.
Government regulation is also a legitimate reason to turn to decentralized storage services. With the Chinese policymakers taking more power, platforms such as TikTok have been under pressure. Decentralization may help use a distributed leverage or a system like the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS).
And that does not just refer to social media sites.
We seriously need to consider the way we store items for decentralization more than ever. Protection can be enhanced with a decentralized storage system since it is distributed across many nodes. This ensures that the whole system can not be manipulated if there is a hack or a government shutdown. It would also render the data more secure — not under the authority of a centralized third party.
Let’s look at how a couple of decentralized storage services — Bluzelle and Filecoin — operate. Although they share some similar and non-similar characteristics, they may actually be utilized together for a fully decentralized escapade.
The “Airbnb of Database Storage,” Bluzelle, offers app developers a place to store data. Unused storage space is in abundance. Thus Bluzelle sources storage from the public, which acts as a network validator. The theory is that the storage room will never run out.
Filecoin is a filing storage service. Utilizing massively-distributed IPFS tech (a P2P protocol for sharing files and web page hosting that operates through a large network of computers), Filecoin offers you a secure place to store files. It wants to be a platform for the preservation of the most significant info of humankind.
Decentralized Storage Offers: Bluzelle vs. Filecoin
How different they are
There are a lot of variations amid the couple of them. The most striking difference is that Filecoin is used for storing files, and Bluzelle is intended for storing data.
Filecoin uses the IPFS — which may be utilized to store data but actually does not warrant how long the data will be offered unless you host it yourself. In reality, IPFS as a system is more aimed at addressing and transporting data.
Bluzelle doesn’t utilize IPFS and, actually, sees the framework as of use, but just if it relies on the belief that most of its nodes actively choose to support IPFS as a cause.
Bluzelle aims to offer a scalable and open database infrastructure primed for dApps worldwide. With Bluzelle’s distinctive swarm-of-swarms architecture, it’s in the position to scale-up to deal with substantial quantities of data since each data portion is repeated just in one swarm.
Building Blocks: Things In Common
To start with, Bluzelle and Filecoin both utilize blockchain tech. Bluzelle does this by “swarming”—splitting and storing data through several computers via distributed leverage tech. Filecoin utilizes the blockchain to keep a record of transfers between users. It utilizes IPFS, too — which has a similar architecture to the blockchain yet is not the same.
Primarily, they are similar as they are non-centralized storage solutions. This implies, unlike Google Drive, that there is no one person in control of the network. Both work by allowing several nodes to do the job of storing — no one is in control.
Both Bluzelle and Filecoin have a ton in common — and they should work to balance one another.
Syncing: How They Comple One Another
File systems are usually hard to handle. Files may be huge, and their contents may not be that searchable. With a decentralized file storage service, such as Filecoin, files are split up and scattered across the network.
When developers build applications, they have to store and handle data in many ways, based on size and use. So it wouldn’t be enough to store them on Filecoin. dApp developers will require something else so that they can quickly be checked and restored.
Big files, a video, for instance, can be on Filecoin for fast uploads. But the links to the video, and the metadata, could be kept on Bluzelle, rendering it simpler to locate and get back.
Bluzelle’s platform is at all times accessible, and its database provides a degree of protection to files that can not be offered just with Filecoin.
Filecoin is certainly a tool of great use, but if it works hand-in-hand with Bluzelle, it can potentially provide a storage solution for the decentralized internet.